2007 Cadillac CTS vs. 1973 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2007 Cadillac CTS is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2007 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac CTS (263 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac CTS | 1973 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | CTS | Colt |
Year Released | 2007 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2801 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 263 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2360 mm |