2007 Cadillac CTS vs. 1976 Mini MK IV
To start off, 2007 Cadillac CTS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mini MK IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mini MK IV would be higher. At 2,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1976 Mini MK IV. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1976 Mini MK IV.
Because 2007 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Mini MK IV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac CTS (263 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mini MK IV. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mini MK IV.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac CTS | 1976 Mini MK IV | |
Make | Cadillac | Mini |
Model | CTS | MK IV |
Year Released | 2007 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2801 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 263 Nm | 61 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2040 mm |