2007 Cadillac CTS vs. 1982 Mazda 929
To start off, 2007 Cadillac CTS is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 929. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 929.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac CTS (263 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Cadillac CTS | 1982 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | CTS | 929 |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2801 cc | 1970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 263 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2620 mm |
