2007 Cadillac CTS vs. 1986 Holden Gemini
To start off, 2007 Cadillac CTS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Gemini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Gemini would be higher. At 2,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1986 Holden Gemini. (66 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Gemini.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac CTS (263 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Holden Gemini. (110 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Holden Gemini.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac CTS | 1986 Holden Gemini | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | CTS | Gemini |
Year Released | 2007 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2801 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 263 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2410 mm |