2007 Cadillac CTS vs. 1998 Ford Telstar
To start off, 2007 Cadillac CTS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 2,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1998 Ford Telstar. (163 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Telstar.
Because 2007 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Telstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac CTS (263 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Telstar. (217 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Telstar.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac CTS | 1998 Ford Telstar | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | CTS | Telstar |
Year Released | 2007 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2801 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 263 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |