2007 Cadillac CTS vs. 1998 Ford Triton
To start off, 2007 Cadillac CTS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Triton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Triton would be higher. At 2,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1998 Ford Triton. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Triton.
Because 2007 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Triton, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac CTS (263 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Triton. (174 Nm). This means 2007 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Triton.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Cadillac CTS | 1998 Ford Triton | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | CTS | Triton |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2801 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 263 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3520 mm |
