2007 Cadillac CTS vs. 2001 Rover 75

To start off, 2007 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Rover 75 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac CTS (212 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2001 Rover 75. (177 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2001 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 475 kg more than 2001 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2007 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Rover 75 (325 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Cadillac CTS. (263 Nm). This means 2001 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Cadillac CTS.

Compare all specifications: