2007 Cadillac CTS vs. 2006 Isuzu I-350
To start off, 2007 Cadillac CTS is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-350 would be higher. At 3,458 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2007 Cadillac CTS. (212 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 2007 Cadillac CTS.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Cadillac CTS. (263 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac CTS | 2006 Isuzu I-350 | |
Make | Cadillac | Isuzu |
Model | CTS | I-350 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 3458 cc |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 263 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 74 L |