2007 Cadillac CTS vs. 2007 Holden Commodore
To start off, both 2007 Cadillac CTS and 2007 Holden Commodore were released in the same year (2007). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac CTS (253 HP) has 13 more horse power than 2007 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2007 Holden Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac CTS (343 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2007 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Cadillac CTS | 2007 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | CTS | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 253 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 343 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.3 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
