2007 Cadillac CTS vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 2,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2007 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Rustler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac CTS (263 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac CTS | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | CTS | Rustler |
Year Released | 2007 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 2801 cc | 1586 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 263 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 54 L |