2007 Cadillac DTS vs. 1961 Mazda R 360
To start off, 2007 Cadillac DTS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac DTS (276 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 260 more horse power than 1961 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1961 Mazda R 360.
Because 1961 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac DTS (400 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 378 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Cadillac DTS | 1961 Mazda R 360 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | DTS | R 360 |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1961 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 356 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 16 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 22 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 2990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 1770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |
