2007 Cadillac DTS vs. 1966 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2007 Cadillac DTS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac DTS (276 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Because 1966 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac DTS (400 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac DTS | 1966 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | DTS | 12 M |
Year Released | 2007 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 1699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 68 L |