2007 Cadillac DTS vs. 1966 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 2007 Cadillac DTS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac DTS (276 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1966 Jaguar MK X. (252 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1966 Jaguar MK X.
Because 1966 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac DTS (400 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Jaguar MK X. (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Jaguar MK X.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac DTS | 1966 Jaguar MK X | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | DTS | MK X |
Year Released | 2007 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 3781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 11.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 63 L |