2007 Cadillac DTS vs. 1976 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 2007 Cadillac DTS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 4,563 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac DTS (292 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1976 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda RX-3.
Because 1976 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac DTS (391 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac DTS | 1976 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | DTS | RX-3 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1976 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4563 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 292 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 391 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 65 L |