2007 Cadillac DTS vs. 1995 Rover 800
To start off, 2007 Cadillac DTS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 800 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac DTS (276 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1995 Rover 800. (167 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 800.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac DTS (400 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 800. (225 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 800.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac DTS | 1995 Rover 800 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | DTS | 800 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1995 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 2675 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 4.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 68 L |