2007 Cadillac DTS vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2007 Cadillac DTS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac DTS (275 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (213 HP @ 2800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline.
Because 1999 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (575 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Cadillac DTS. (400 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Cadillac DTS.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac DTS | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | DTS | Econoline |
Year Released | 2007 | 1999 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 7275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 213 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 575 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3510 mm |