2007 Cadillac SRX vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2007 Cadillac SRX is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac SRX (255 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 947 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac SRX (344 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac SRX | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | SRX | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2007 | 1972 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3556 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 344 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1889 kg | 942 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2210 mm |