2007 Cadillac SRX vs. 2002 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2007 Cadillac SRX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2007 Cadillac SRX. (255 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2007 Cadillac SRX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 89 kg more than 2002 Jaguar XJ.
Because 2007 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Cadillac SRX. (344 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Cadillac SRX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Cadillac SRX | 2002 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
| Model | SRX | XJ |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3554 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 344 Nm | 541 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1889 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3040 mm |
