2007 Cadillac SRX vs. 2003 Mazda 6

To start off, 2007 Cadillac SRX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 3,554 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac SRX (255 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 544 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2007 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac SRX (344 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 2007 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Cadillac SRX 2003 Mazda 6
Make Cadillac Mazda
Model SRX 6
Year Released 2007 2003
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3554 cc 1594 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 255 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 344 Nm 240 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Top Speed 201 km/hour 185 km/hour
Acceleration 0-100mph 8.1 seconds 11 seconds
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1889 kg 1345 kg
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.8 L/100km 7.2 L/100km