2007 Cadillac STS-V vs. 1979 Chrysler 160
To start off, 2007 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac STS-V (469 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 380 more horse power than 1979 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 1979 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac STS-V (595 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 463 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Cadillac STS-V | 1979 Chrysler 160 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
| Model | STS-V | 160 |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4376 cc | 1639 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 469 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 595 Nm | 132 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2680 mm |
