2007 Cadillac STS-V vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Starion
To start off, 2007 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Starion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Starion would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac STS-V (469 HP) has 324 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Starion. (145 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Starion.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac STS-V (595 Nm) has 344 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Starion. (251 Nm). This means 2007 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Starion. 2007 Cadillac STS-V has automatic transmission and 1982 Mitsubishi Starion has manual transmission. 1982 Mitsubishi Starion will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Cadillac STS-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac STS-V | 1982 Mitsubishi Starion | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | STS-V | Starion |
Year Released | 2007 | 1982 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4376 cc | 2555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 469 HP | 145 HP |
Torque | 595 Nm | 251 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |