2007 Cadillac STS-V vs. 2002 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2007 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac STS-V (469 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 271 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac STS-V (595 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac STS-V | 2002 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | STS-V | Econoline |
Year Released | 2007 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4376 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 469 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 595 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3510 mm |