2007 Cadillac STS-V vs. 2012 Bentley Mulsanne
To start off, 2012 Bentley Mulsanne is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Cadillac STS-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Cadillac STS-V would be higher. At 6,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Bentley Mulsanne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Bentley Mulsanne (505 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2007 Cadillac STS-V. (469 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Bentley Mulsanne should accelerate faster than 2007 Cadillac STS-V.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Bentley Mulsanne (1,018 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 423 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Cadillac STS-V. (595 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2012 Bentley Mulsanne will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Cadillac STS-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Cadillac STS-V | 2012 Bentley Mulsanne | |
| Make | Cadillac | Bentley |
| Model | STS-V | Mulsanne |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4376 cc | 6800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 469 HP | 505 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 595 Nm | 1018 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5575 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1925 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1521 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3266 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 96 L |
