2007 Cadillac STS vs. 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk

To start off, 2007 Cadillac STS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac STS (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk. (101 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Cadillac STS weights approximately 216 kg more than 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac STS (427 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk. (206 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Cadillac STS 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk
Make Cadillac Studebaker
Model STS Silver Hawk
Year Released 2007 1960
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4565 cc 3050 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 320 HP 101 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 427 Nm 206 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 1800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 93 mm 76.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 111 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 7.8:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1566 kg 1350 kg
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 5190 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 3070 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]