2007 Cadillac STS vs. 1961 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2007 Cadillac STS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac STS (255 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac STS | 1961 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
Model | STS | 62 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3556 cc | 6389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 98.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 79 L |