2007 Cadillac STS vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2007 Cadillac STS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac STS (253 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Cadillac STS weights approximately 612 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac STS (342 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac STS | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | STS | 2000 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3563 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 342 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.6 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1782 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 64 L |