2007 Cadillac STS vs. 1964 Wartburg 312

To start off, 2007 Cadillac STS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac STS (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 1964 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1964 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Cadillac STS weights approximately 672 kg more than 1964 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2007 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Wartburg 312, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac STS (427 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 346 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Wartburg 312.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Cadillac STS 1964 Wartburg 312
Make Cadillac Wartburg
Model STS 312
Year Released 2007 1964
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4565 cc 900 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 320 HP 36 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 427 Nm 81 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 2200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 93 mm 70 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 78 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 6.6:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1638 kg 966 kg
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 4310 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1580 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2460 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 43 L