2007 Cadillac STS vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 2007 Cadillac STS is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac STS (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac STS (427 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Cadillac STS | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | STS | 140 |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 80 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2620 mm |
