2007 Cadillac STS vs. 1992 Rover Mini

To start off, 2007 Cadillac STS is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover Mini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover Mini would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac STS (321 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 270 more horse power than 1992 Rover Mini. (51 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover Mini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Cadillac STS weights approximately 945 kg more than 1992 Rover Mini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac STS (427 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 338 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover Mini. (89 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover Mini. 2007 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 1992 Rover Mini has manual transmission. 1992 Rover Mini will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Cadillac STS 1992 Rover Mini
Make Cadillac Rover
Model STS Mini
Year Released 2007 1992
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4565 cc 1275 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 321 HP 51 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 427 Nm 89 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 2600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 93 mm 70.7 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 81.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 9.4:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1635 kg 690 kg
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 3060 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1450 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2040 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 8.7 L/100km 8.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.8 L/100km 7.6 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.8 L/100km 5.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 34 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]