2007 Cadillac STS vs. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv
To start off, 2007 Cadillac STS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv (276 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2007 Cadillac STS. (255 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv should accelerate faster than 2007 Cadillac STS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac STS (342 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. (214 Nm @ 8000 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac STS | 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | STS | RX-Evolv |
Year Released | 2007 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3556 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 9000 RPM |
Torque | 342 Nm | 214 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1360 mm |