2007 Cadillac STS vs. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW
To start off, 2007 Cadillac STS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi SUW would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac STS (255 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW.
Because 2007 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac STS (342 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. (240 Nm). This means 2007 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Cadillac STS | 1999 Mitsubishi SUW | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | STS | SUW |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3556 cc | 1099 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 342 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 74 L |
