2007 Cadillac STS vs. 2004 BMW 316

To start off, 2007 Cadillac STS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW 316 would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac STS (255 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 2004 BMW 316. (113 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 316.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac STS (342 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW 316. (175 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW 316.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Cadillac STS 2004 BMW 316
Make Cadillac BMW
Model STS 316
Year Released 2007 2004
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3556 cc 1796 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 255 HP 113 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 342 Nm 175 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 3750 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.2:1 11.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 4270 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2730 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.2 L/100km 7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 63 L