2007 Cadillac XLR vs. 1987 Zastava 750
To start off, 2007 Cadillac XLR is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac XLR (443 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 410 more horse power than 1987 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1987 Zastava 750.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac XLR (561 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 505 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Zastava 750. (56 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Zastava 750. 2007 Cadillac XLR has automatic transmission and 1987 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1987 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Cadillac XLR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac XLR | 1987 Zastava 750 | |
Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
Model | XLR | 750 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1987 |
Engine Size | 4376 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 443 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 561 Nm | 56 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2010 mm |