2007 Cadillac XLR vs. 1994 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2007 Cadillac XLR is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac XLR (443 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 309 more horse power than 1994 Ford Tempo. (134 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Tempo.
Because 2007 Cadillac XLR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Cadillac XLR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac XLR (561 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Tempo. (203 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Cadillac XLR | 1994 Ford Tempo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | XLR | Tempo |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4376 cc | 2986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 443 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 561 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2540 mm |
