2007 Cadillac XLR vs. 1999 Mazda Laputa

To start off, 2007 Cadillac XLR is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda Laputa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda Laputa would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac XLR (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 267 more horse power than 1999 Mazda Laputa. (53 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda Laputa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 905 kg more than 1999 Mazda Laputa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2007 Cadillac XLR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Cadillac XLR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Laputa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac XLR (420 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 357 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda Laputa. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda Laputa.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Cadillac XLR 1999 Mazda Laputa
Make Cadillac Mazda
Model XLR Laputa
Year Released 2007 1999
Body Type Convertible Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4565 cc 658 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 320 HP 53 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 420 Nm 63 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 93 mm 68 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84.1 mm 60.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 10.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1655 kg 750 kg
Vehicle Length 4520 mm 3400 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1480 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1540 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 2370 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 30 L