2007 Cadillac XLR vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2007 Cadillac XLR is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Cadillac XLR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Cadillac XLR | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | XLR | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4376 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 443 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3010 mm |
