2007 Cadillac XLR vs. 2004 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2007 Cadillac XLR is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac XLR (443 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 243 more horse power than 2004 Chrysler Sebring. (200 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 2004 Chrysler Sebring.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac XLR (561 Nm) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler Sebring. (258 Nm). This means 2007 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac XLR | 2004 Chrysler Sebring | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | XLR | Sebring |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4376 cc | 2735 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 443 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 561 Nm | 258 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 61 L |