2007 Cadillac XLR vs. 2006 Ford E-150
To start off, 2007 Cadillac XLR is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac XLR (443 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-150. (226 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac XLR (561 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford E-150. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Cadillac XLR | 2006 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | XLR | E-150 |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4376 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 443 HP | 226 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 561 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.7 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 132 L |
