2007 Cadillac XLR vs. 2006 Nissan Interstar
To start off, 2007 Cadillac XLR is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan Interstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan Interstar would be higher. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac XLR (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Interstar. (112 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Interstar.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac XLR (420 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan Interstar. (290 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan Interstar. 2007 Cadillac XLR has automatic transmission and 2006 Nissan Interstar has manual transmission. 2006 Nissan Interstar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Cadillac XLR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Cadillac XLR | 2006 Nissan Interstar | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | XLR | Interstar |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2006 |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 139 km/hour |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 580 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 100 L |
