2007 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 2007 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chevrolet Colorado (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 2007 Chevrolet Colorado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Chevrolet Colorado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chevrolet Colorado (258 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2007 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chevrolet Colorado | 1963 Holden EJ | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Colorado | EJ |
Year Released | 2007 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2901 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2680 mm |