2007 Chevrolet Epica vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 2007 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 765 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323.
Because 1980 Mazda 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Chevrolet Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2007 Chevrolet Epica has automatic transmission and 1980 Mazda 323 has manual transmission. 1980 Mazda 323 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Chevrolet Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Chevrolet Epica | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Epica | 323 |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2492 cc | 985 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2320 mm |
