2007 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1978 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2007 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1978 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 792 kg more than 1978 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2007 Chevrolet Equinox is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2007 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Chevrolet Equinox | 1978 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Equinox | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3425 cc | 2290 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2480 mm |
