2007 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 2002 Renault Clio

To start off, 2007 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 1460 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2007 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio. 2007 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 2002 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2002 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Chevrolet Equinox 2002 Renault Clio
Make Chevrolet Renault
Model Equinox Clio
Year Released 2007 2002
Body Type SUV Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3425 cc 1149 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 185 HP 73 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 285 Nm 105 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 9.8:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 2360 kg 900 kg
Vehicle Length 4800 mm 3780 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1710 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2480 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 9.4 L/100km 5.1 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 12.4 L/100km 8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.2 L/100km 6.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 50 L