2007 Chevrolet Evanda vs. 2005 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2007 Chevrolet Evanda is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan 350Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan 350Z would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan 350Z (287 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 2007 Chevrolet Evanda. (119 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 2007 Chevrolet Evanda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Chevrolet Evanda weights approximately 28 kg more than 2005 Nissan 350Z.
Because 2005 Nissan 350Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Nissan 350Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Chevrolet Evanda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan 350Z (354 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Chevrolet Evanda. (176 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Chevrolet Evanda.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Chevrolet Evanda | 2005 Nissan 350Z | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | Evanda | 350Z |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 287 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1469 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 76 L |
