2007 Chevrolet Evanda vs. 2009 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2009 Suzuki Equator is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Chevrolet Evanda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Chevrolet Evanda would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Suzuki Equator (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2007 Chevrolet Evanda. (119 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 2007 Chevrolet Evanda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Chevrolet Evanda weights approximately 522 kg more than 2009 Suzuki Equator.
Because 2009 Suzuki Equator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Suzuki Equator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Chevrolet Evanda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chevrolet Evanda (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Suzuki Equator. (171 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Chevrolet Evanda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Suzuki Equator.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chevrolet Evanda | 2009 Suzuki Equator | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | Evanda | Equator |
Year Released | 2007 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 171 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.8 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 80 L |