2007 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1966 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2007 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,397 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chevrolet HHR (175 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Because 1966 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chevrolet HHR (224 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2007 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chevrolet HHR | 1966 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | HHR | 12 M |
Year Released | 2007 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2397 cc | 1699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.9 mm | 82.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 97.8 mm | 82 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2530 mm |