2007 Chevrolet HHR vs. 2004 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2007 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 2,397 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chevrolet HHR (175 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2004 Honda CR-V. (160 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 2004 Honda CR-V.
Because 2004 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Chevrolet HHR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chevrolet HHR (224 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Honda CR-V. (218 Nm). This means 2007 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Chevrolet HHR | 2004 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
| Model | HHR | CR-V |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2397 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 224 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.9 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 97.8 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2630 mm |
