2007 Chevrolet HHR vs. 2009 Mazda 5

To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Chevrolet HHR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Chevrolet HHR would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 5 (151 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2007 Chevrolet HHR. (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 2007 Chevrolet HHR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 5 weights approximately 477 kg more than 2007 Chevrolet HHR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chevrolet HHR (206 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 5. (148 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2007 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 5.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Chevrolet HHR 2009 Mazda 5
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model HHR 5
Year Released 2007 2009
Body Type Hatchback Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2189 cc 2260 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 150 HP 151 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 206 Nm 148 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.7:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 6 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1073 kg 1550 kg
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1760 mm
Fuel Consumption 7.8 L/100km 8.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 10.7 L/100km 10.7 L/100km