2007 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2011 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2011 Fisker Karma is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Chevrolet Impala would be higher.
Because 2011 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Chevrolet Impala | 2011 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Fisker |
| Model | Impala | Karma |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 36 L |
