2007 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 2007 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Acura TL would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura TL (176 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2007 Chevrolet Malibu. (144 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2007 Chevrolet Malibu.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chevrolet Malibu | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Chevrolet | Acura |
Model | Malibu | TL |
Year Released | 2007 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 144 HP | 176 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2840 mm |